i think this question is for me so i will try to answer briefly, though lmk if it was intended for op lmao
also i'll answer on the assumption it was asked in good faith:
do i still think that democrats and republicans are not the same? yes; i don't have the time today to refresh charts etc., but a very quick glance at the same sources i used the first time around looks like the numbers have remained more or less stable. happy to take correction here if anyone has more time to delve
- importantly, we are also already seeing the impact of elected democrats at both national and state / local levels. there are many many many sources covering what has been done federally (or attempted in the face of GOP obstructionism) both from mainstream news sources (think NPR, Hill, WaPo, the recently-deservedly-maligned NYT, etc.) and on tumblr itself, so i won't do the google work here
- at the state level, states that put democrats in power during the midterms are already seeing legislation and orders being put in place for abortion rights and LGBTQ+ protections -- something visible on any map showing where "safe(ish)" states are
- in michigan alone where dems won a trifecta for the first time in decades we've repealed anti-union legislation, enacted increased background checks for gun purchases, repealed the draconian 1931 abortion law set to take effect post-Roe, and passed protections for sexual orientation and gender identity
- so much for democrats being the same or worse than republicans
on immigration specifically, do i think reform is still needed? yes; in particular i do think there should be close scrutiny of how the numbers trend as the biden admin continues to announce and enact its proposed policies if the PHE does indeed expire in may
- with that said, i think any truly focused analysis should consider the context of those numbers as well -- the quick-and-dirty i did looked only at raw numbers, not conditions of detention, enforcement approach, targeted or prioritized nationalities, and many other factors that provide a better picture of what is actually happening at the southern US border
on criminal justice specifically, do i think reform is still needed? yes; and importantly here it's worth keeping track of what the dem white house and dem congresspeople are trying to do vs what is able to happen (e.g. George Floyd Act)
- i won't get into a long screed here on the need for tumblr and voters broadly to understand how laws get passed (or don't get passed bc they get stuck eternally in committee) but even pre-midterms we had valuable laws trapped in congressional deadlock. midterm losses weren't nearly as bad as they could have been, but it's still a tighter margin with a deeply-intractable set of republicans -- whose inaction should be emphasized and considered when it comes time to vote
- it's also worth noting that the comparison here is between a party that on average acknowledges racial disparity in policing even if they don't always agree on the approach / align with the leftmost demands on how to address the problem vs a party that on average openly courts cop unions, openly calls protestors rioters and terrorists, frequently denies that racial disparities even exist, and proudly yells "blue lives matter"
- like yeah, the bar is in the ground. but do we want to be in the ground with it or actually trying to get some lift-off?
- comparison also applies to immigration point above tbh i am just disorganized today and didn't write it there
do i still think dems-and-repubs-are-the-same reeks of voter-suppression propaganda? yes, and even more so when the evidence continues to pile up that dem legislatures and leaders at every level are making real progress on issues that we all purport to care about. who benefits when certain types of voters feel like their vote doesn't matter? the people who want to disenfranchise them!
do i still think it's important to contextualize data and question sources and stats? yes!!!!!!!!!! yes!!!! and i know it's not easy and it's time-consuming, but again: who benefits when we don't approach information with a critical mind? not us!
- this doesn't mean we (collectively, as voters, as well as specifically voters on the left) are always going to agree -- but the more we can approach disagreements using the same set of facts, the more we can have a meaningful debate on what can actually be done instead of what is even reality
do i still think it's important to vote? yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
- again i won't get into what could be a long screed here, but we are already seeing what can happen when we get left-leaning politicians into office
- i specify left-leaning as opposed to any specific set of political beliefs because i know there is no such thing as a perfect politician, even putting aside the fact that nobody would be able to agree on what a perfect politician would believe or do
- but incremental progress is still progress -- and voting is as much a form of feedback for legislators as it is a demand, which is to say if you have a democrat who has done things you like? reward them by voting for them again! have they missed some things? call up their office and say "as someone who voted for [x], i'm disappointed by [y]" -- it's MUCH more effective than complaining as a non-voter
- our current political context is also particularly important here -- there are times when it's valuable to have a slimmer margin to keep both parties on their toes. right now however one party is doing everything it can to leap off the deep end and it's more valuable to deliver some security to the party that isn't so it doesn't feel as much of a need to tread carefully and court the mid-right and can take firmer leftward stances
- in other words we have got to stop thinking of politicians as individuals acting on individual preferences. they get elected to represent a set of priorities indicated by voters -- but if a portion of those voters doesn't show up, how are they supposed to prioritize or even know about those people's issues? vibes????
- look, for all the many foibles of the US system, it remains a fact that the right to vote is one of the most powerful tools a citizenry can have
- you actually get to show up and tell your government -- local, state, federal -- whether you're pissed off. and they have to hear it!
- there is a reason status quo groups want to prevent more people from voting -- because it's powerful and they know it! why let them take that power from us?
am i still going to abuse bullet points? yeah
- i'm not sorry about it
- i've made so many slide decks in my life
- i've earned this
- i am sorry i made this post even longer though. sorry to anyone who has 'keep reading' turned off